Maker-Taker Fees
The maker-taker fee model charges different fees based on whether an order adds liquidity (maker, typically receives a rebate) or removes liquidity (taker, pays a fee), incentivizing limit order placement.
The macro regime is STAGFLATION STABLE — growth decelerating (GDPNow 1.3%, consumer sentiment 56.6, housing deeply contractionary) while inflation is sticky-to-rising (Cleveland Fed CPI Nowcast 5.28%, PCE Nowcast 4.58%, GSCPI elevated). The bear steepening yield curve (30Y +10bp, 10Y +7bp 1M) with r…
What Are Maker-Taker Fees?
The maker-taker fee model is a pricing structure used by most stock and options exchanges that differentiates fees based on whether an order adds or removes liquidity. Orders that add liquidity to the order book (makers) receive a small rebate per share, while orders that remove liquidity (takers) pay a fee. This asymmetric pricing incentivizes market participants to post limit orders, deepening the order book and improving market quality.
The model has become the dominant exchange pricing structure since the early 2000s and plays a significant role in how orders are routed, how market makers operate, and how trading strategies are designed.
How the Model Works
When a trader places a limit buy order below the current ask, it rests in the order book and adds liquidity. If another trader later places a market sell order that executes against this limit buy, the limit order trader (maker) receives a rebate and the market order trader (taker) pays a fee.
The exchange collects the taker fee and pays out the maker rebate, keeping the difference as revenue. Typical US equity exchange rebates are around $0.002-$0.003 per share for makers, and fees are around $0.003 per share for takers. The exchange earns the net difference (roughly $0.001 per share) plus revenue from data and technology services.
Impact on Market Behavior
The maker-taker model has significantly influenced market structure. Market makers design their strategies around capturing rebates, posting limit orders aggressively to earn the maker rebate on as many shares as possible. At scale, rebate revenue is substantial.
Rebate arbitrage strategies attempt to profit primarily from exchange rebates rather than from price movements. A trader might post aggressive limit orders that are likely to fill, earning the rebate on each fill, and then immediately hedge the position on another venue.
Order routing decisions are influenced by maker-taker economics. Brokers may route orders to exchanges offering the highest rebates, which creates potential conflicts with best execution obligations. Regulators have questioned whether rebates distort order routing and market quality.
Some exchanges use an inverted model (taker-maker) that pays rebates to takers and charges makers, attracting different types of trading activity and creating competitive diversity among venues.
Frequently Asked Questions
▶What is the difference between a maker and a taker?
▶How much are maker-taker fees?
▶How do maker-taker fees affect trading strategies?
Maker-Taker Fees is one of the signals monitored daily in the AI-driven macro analysis on Convex Trading. The platform synthesises data across monetary policy, credit, sentiment, and on-chain metrics to generate actionable trade recommendations. Create a free account to build your own signal layer and see how Maker-Taker Fees is influencing current positions.
Macro briefings in your inbox
Daily analysis that explains which glossary signals are firing and why.