CONVEX
Glossary/Equity Markets & Volatility/Earnings Yield Gap
Equity Markets & Volatility
3 min readUpdated Apr 4, 2026

Earnings Yield Gap

EYGFed Modelbond-equity yield ratioBEYR

The earnings yield gap measures the difference between the equity earnings yield (the inverse of the P/E ratio) and the 10-year government bond yield, providing a cross-asset valuation signal that indicates whether equities are cheap or expensive relative to bonds on a forward return basis.

Current Macro RegimeSTAGFLATIONDEEPENING

The macro regime is unambiguously STAGFLATION DEEPENING. Growth signals are decelerating on multiple dimensions — OECD CLI sub-100, consumer sentiment at recessionary 56.6, quit rate falling to 1.9%, housing frozen — while the inflation pipeline is re-accelerating. PPI 3M momentum at +0.7% is runnin…

Analysis from Apr 8, 2026

What Is the Earnings Yield Gap?

The earnings yield gap (EYG) is computed as the equity earnings yield — typically forward 12-month EPS divided by the current index price — minus the 10-year nominal government bond yield. A positive gap means equities offer a higher prospective yield than bonds, suggesting relative value in stocks; a negative gap implies bonds offer superior compensation per unit of expected return.

This framework is closely related to the Fed Model, a concept popularized by Ed Yardeni in the 1990s based on Federal Reserve research, which proposed that equity markets are fairly valued when the earnings yield equals the 10-year Treasury yield. The earnings yield gap operationalizes this framework into a spread that traders can monitor over time and across markets.

Note that the earnings yield uses forward earnings estimates, making it sensitive to the earnings revision cycle — a key source of signal contamination when analyst estimates are systematically biased.

Why It Matters for Traders

The EYG is one of the most widely used cross-asset valuation signals among institutional equity strategists and macro traders. It directly quantifies the equity risk premium on an earnings-based rather than dividend-based methodology, and it frames equity allocation decisions within the broader yield curve and monetary policy environment.

When the EYG is wide (equities offer significantly more yield than bonds), it historically supports equity overweights and risk-on positioning. When the gap collapses or inverts — as occurred in late 2022 and 2023 when rising real yields crushed equity valuations — it signals that the TINA (There Is No Alternative) trade is reversing, with capital rotating from equities to fixed income.

Multi-asset macro funds use EYG dynamics to time great rotation trades between equities and fixed income, particularly around major central bank pivots.

How to Read and Interpret It

For the S&P 500 versus the US 10-year Treasury:

  • EYG > +200bp: Historically supportive of above-average forward equity returns; equities offer compelling relative value.
  • EYG between 0 and +200bp: Neutral zone; allocation driven more by momentum, earnings trends, and financial conditions.
  • EYG < 0 (negative gap): Rare historically pre-2022; suggests bonds offer better risk-adjusted returns. Sustained negative gaps typically correlate with equity multiple compression.

Always compare the EYG against its own historical range for a given market — European and Japanese equity EYGs have different baseline levels than the US due to structural differences in earnings yields and sovereign bond yields.

Historical Context

From 2009 through 2021, the US EYG averaged approximately +350 to +400 basis points, driven by ultra-low Treasury yields suppressed by quantitative easing. This wide gap provided the fundamental underpinning for the secular bull market narrative — equities were structurally cheap relative to bonds even at historically elevated P/E multiples.

In 2022, as the Fed raised rates from near-zero to over 5%, the 10-year Treasury yield surged from approximately 1.5% to 4.0%+. The S&P 500 forward earnings yield simultaneously compressed as prices fell. By early 2023, the EYG had narrowed to approximately +50 to +100bp — the tightest since the early 2000s dot-com era — fundamentally challenging the equity bull case and creating the most attractive bond entry point in 15 years.

Limitations and Caveats

The EYG's core weakness is its dependence on forward earnings estimates, which are systematically optimistic and subject to sharp earnings revision cycles. Using inflated forward EPS to compute earnings yield creates a false sense of equity cheapness. Additionally, the model breaks down in deflationary environments where bond yields are low due to weak growth rather than accommodation, as earnings expectations should also fall.

Academic critics note the Fed Model has no strong theoretical foundation, as it conflates nominal bond yields (which embed inflation) with real earnings yields (which are real economic flows).

What to Watch

Monitor the spread between S&P 500 forward earnings yield and the 10-year TIPS yield (real earnings yield gap) for a theoretically cleaner signal. Also track EYG dispersion across sectors and geographies — divergences between US, European, and emerging market EYGs often drive global sector rotation flows.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a normal or healthy earnings yield gap for US equities?
Historically, the US EYG (S&P 500 forward earnings yield minus 10-year Treasury yield) has averaged approximately 200–400 basis points over long periods, providing a reasonable buffer of equity compensation above the risk-free rate. Gaps below 100bp have historically been associated with elevated equity valuation risk and subsequent underperformance.
How does quantitative tightening affect the earnings yield gap?
Quantitative tightening removes a key buyer of Treasuries, pushing bond yields higher and directly compressing the EYG — making equities less attractive on a relative basis. This is one of the core transmission mechanisms by which monetary policy tightening slows equity markets beyond just the discount rate effect on DCF valuations.
Is the earnings yield gap more useful than the Shiller CAPE for market timing?
The EYG is more useful in real-time cross-asset allocation decisions because it explicitly incorporates the opportunity cost of bonds, while the Shiller CAPE (cyclically adjusted P/E) is better suited for long-horizon valuation assessment. Most sophisticated macro traders use both in combination alongside financial conditions indicators for a fuller picture.

Earnings Yield Gap is one of the signals monitored daily in the AI-driven macro analysis on Convex Trading. The platform synthesises data across monetary policy, credit, sentiment, and on-chain metrics to generate actionable trade recommendations. Create a free account to build your own signal layer and see how Earnings Yield Gap is influencing current positions.