CONVEX
Correlation Deep Dive

Homebuilders (XHB) vs Consumer Discretionary (XLY): Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation of daily returns for Homebuilders (XHB) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY). Rolling windows, yearly breakdown, regression beta, and divergence analysis. Data window spans to (1,262 aligned observations).

30-Day
+0.742
Strong positive
90-Day
+0.665
Strong positive
1-Year
+0.600
Strong positive
5-Year
+0.716
Strong positive

What the Number Means

At 0.67, Homebuilders (XHB) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) have a strong tendency to move together. Most daily moves align, though divergences are common enough that the relationship should not be treated as deterministic. A shared regime or macro factor is likely driving both.

Recent vs Long-Run Behavior

Last 90 Days
+0.665
5-Year Baseline
+0.716

Recent correlation tracks the long-run relationship closely. No meaningful divergence. The historical pattern between Homebuilders (XHB) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) is intact and should continue to serve as a reasonable baseline for positioning.

Statistical Details (1-Year Window)

Pearson Correlation (r)+0.600
R-Squared (r²)0.360
Beta (Homebuilders (XHB) vs Consumer Discretionary (XLY))0.881
Daily Volatility σ(Homebuilders (XHB))1.69%
Daily Volatility σ(Consumer Discretionary (XLY))1.15%
Observations252

Correlation measures directional co-movement; R² quantifies the fraction of variance explained by the linear relationship. Beta is the slope coefficient from regressing Homebuilders (XHB) returns on Consumer Discretionary (XLY) returns. A beta above 1 means the first asset amplifies moves of the second.

Year-by-Year Correlation

YearCorrelationStrengthObservations
2026+0.654Strong positive91
2025+0.675Strong positive250
2024+0.559Moderate positive252
2023+0.714Strong positive250
2022+0.824Very strong positive251
2021+0.686Strong positive168

Year-by-year correlation reveals how the relationship has held up across different macro regimes. Sharp year-over-year swings in correlation often mark the transition between stress and calm periods.

Rolling 90-Day Extremes

Most Correlated Period
+0.871
ending 2022-09-22
Most Decoupled Period
+0.431
ending 2025-01-14

Extremes in rolling 90-day correlation often coincide with regime changes, forced deleveraging, or the arrival of a dominant new macro theme that overwhelms normal relationships.

Methodology

Correlations are computed on daily log-adjacent returns for Homebuilders (XHB) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY), aligned on shared trading dates. We use the Pearson product-moment coefficient, which measures the linear relationship between two return series.

Windows are the most recent N observations for 30D, 90D, and 1Y (252 trading days); the 5Y figure uses all aligned data up to 1,260 observations. Beta is the OLS slope from regressing the first series on the second. Data updates daily with a 24-hour revalidation cadence.

Related Correlations

More Comparisons

Get daily macro analysis on shifting correlations, regime transitions, and cross-asset signals.

Correlation is not causation and backward-looking statistics can fail when regimes shift. Positions sized on historical correlation assumptions should be stress-tested against scenarios where the relationship breaks. For informational purposes only.