Communication (XLC) vs Technology (XLK): Correlation Analysis
Pearson correlation of daily returns for Communication Services (XLC) and Technology (XLK). Rolling windows, yearly breakdown, regression beta, and divergence analysis. Data window spans to (1,262 aligned observations).
What the Number Means
The 0.52 correlation indicates that Communication Services (XLC) and Technology (XLK) have a moderate tendency to move together. The relationship is real but noisy, with frequent days where they disagree. Regime context matters: the correlation often strengthens during stress and weakens during calm periods.
Recent vs Long-Run Behavior
The correlation has weakened materially. The 90-day reading of 0.52 sits 0.25 below the long-run average of 0.77. Falling correlation signals the dispersion regime where idiosyncratic stories dominate and cross-asset diversification benefits improve.
Statistical Details (1-Year Window)
| Pearson Correlation (r) | +0.509 |
| R-Squared (r²) | 0.259 |
| Beta (Communication Services (XLC) vs Technology (XLK)) | 0.331 |
| Daily Volatility σ(Communication Services (XLC)) | 0.82% |
| Daily Volatility σ(Technology (XLK)) | 1.27% |
| Observations | 252 |
Correlation measures directional co-movement; R² quantifies the fraction of variance explained by the linear relationship. Beta is the slope coefficient from regressing Communication Services (XLC) returns on Technology (XLK) returns. A beta above 1 means the first asset amplifies moves of the second.
Year-by-Year Correlation
| Year | Correlation | Strength | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.516 | Moderate positive | 91 |
| 2025 | +0.790 | Strong positive | 250 |
| 2024 | +0.631 | Strong positive | 252 |
| 2023 | +0.740 | Strong positive | 250 |
| 2022 | +0.880 | Very strong positive | 251 |
| 2021 | +0.752 | Strong positive | 168 |
Year-by-year correlation reveals how the relationship has held up across different macro regimes. Sharp year-over-year swings in correlation often mark the transition between stress and calm periods.
Rolling 90-Day Extremes
Extremes in rolling 90-day correlation often coincide with regime changes, forced deleveraging, or the arrival of a dominant new macro theme that overwhelms normal relationships.
Methodology
Correlations are computed on daily log-adjacent returns for Communication Services (XLC) and Technology (XLK), aligned on shared trading dates. We use the Pearson product-moment coefficient, which measures the linear relationship between two return series.
Windows are the most recent N observations for 30D, 90D, and 1Y (252 trading days); the 5Y figure uses all aligned data up to 1,260 observations. Beta is the OLS slope from regressing the first series on the second. Data updates daily with a 24-hour revalidation cadence.
Related Correlations
More Comparisons
Get daily macro analysis on shifting correlations, regime transitions, and cross-asset signals.
Correlation is not causation and backward-looking statistics can fail when regimes shift. Positions sized on historical correlation assumptions should be stress-tested against scenarios where the relationship breaks. For informational purposes only.