Reverse Repo vs S&P 500
The Fed Overnight Reverse Repo facility (FRED:RRPONTSYD) drained from a December 30, 2022 peak of $2.554 trillion to roughly $0.7 billion on April 29, 2026, a 99.97 percent decline over 28 months. SPY rose from $381.34 to $568.40 over the same window, a 49.1 percent total-return advance.
Also known as: Overnight Reverse Repo (RRP, reverse repo, ON RRP) · S&P 500 ETF (SPY) (ETF_SPY, S&P 500, SPX, SP500)
Why This Comparison Matters
The Fed Overnight Reverse Repo facility (FRED:RRPONTSYD) drained from a December 30, 2022 peak of $2.554 trillion to roughly $0.7 billion on April 29, 2026, a 99.97 percent decline over 28 months. SPY rose from $381.34 to $568.40 over the same window, a 49.1 percent total-return advance. The pair is the cleanest empirical test of the QT-as-equity-headwind thesis.
Why this pair is the most-watched liquidity-versus-equity test
The Fed Overnight Reverse Repo facility (ON RRP) was activated as a daily auction in September 2013 to put a floor under money-market rates. It sat near zero through 2017-2020, then exploded from $10 billion at year-end 2020 to $2.554 trillion at the December 30, 2022 peak (a year-end surge driven by usual quarter-end pressures plus the fed-funds-target lift to 4.25-4.50 percent). The drain from peak to near-zero has been one of the most-watched liquidity sequences of the 2020s, because the policy-watch thesis (articulated by Goldman's Marquee, JPMorgan's Treasury Markets and Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City research) was that RRP-sourced liquidity was the buffer absorbing quantitative tightening before bank reserves had to drain. The pair tests an institutional thesis published most cleanly by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in November 2023 and updated through 2025: as long as RRP balances were available, QT could continue without stressing reserves; once RRP drained to under $200 billion, any additional QT would press directly on reserves. The April 2026 reading of $0.7 billion (effectively zero, with quarter-end blips) is the live test of that thesis, and the SPY advance through the entire drain provides the empirical answer that the thesis was largely correct: the buffer absorbed the QT without producing the equity weakness simpler liquidity models had predicted. Reading the pair in isolation produces the simplest and most misleading version of the question; reading it inside a multi-input net-liquidity composite is the institutionally rigorous frame, and is what makes the pair operationally useful rather than a frequently-cited but rarely-actionable indicator.
The peak-to-near-zero timeline and what each phase tested
December 30, 2022: RRP $2.554 trillion peak. SPY $381.34 close. The peak coincided with the worst SPY year since 2008 (negative 18 percent total return for 2022). Mid-2023: RRP $1.95 trillion average. SPY rallied 26 percent over H1 2023 despite the regional banking stress (March 2023 SVB and Signature failures), refuting the simple thesis that draining liquidity would hold equities back. End 2023: RRP $700 billion. SPY $476.51, up 24.7 percent for the year. Mid-2024: RRP $400 billion (the Wolf Street widely-cited reading), SPY 23 percent ahead year-to-date. December 2024: Fed trimmed the ON RRP rate by 5 bps on top of the rate cut on December 18, 2024, sending RRP to $98 billion within a week, the lowest since April 2021. April 29, 2026: RRP at $0.7 billion, SPY at $568.40 (up 49.1 percent from the December 30, 2022 close). The empirical record is decisive: RRP drained from $2.55 trillion to near-zero, a $2.55 trillion liquidity withdrawal, and SPY advanced 49.1 percent over the same window. The simplest version of the QT-as-equity-headwind thesis is therefore falsified at the multi-year horizon, and any future analysis of the period needs to account for the structural reasons the drain did not produce the predicted equity weakness. The 28-month decline of 99.97 percent of facility balance ranks as the longest sustained liquidity withdrawal of the post-2008 era, dwarfing the 2017-2019 QT episode in both pace and magnitude, and producing the cleanest empirical record available for testing liquidity-versus-equity theses.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Overnight Reverse Repo. Computed from 1,237 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rises 0.24% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.25%. 121 qualifying events; S&P 500 ETF (SPY) closed positive in 60% of them.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the RRP peak and when did it happen?+
The Fed Overnight Reverse Repo facility (ON RRP) peaked at $2.554 trillion on December 30, 2022. The peak was driven by usual year-end regulatory and accounting pressures combined with the fed-funds-target lift to 4.25-4.50 percent in mid-December 2022, which made the 4.30 percent ON RRP rate the most attractive risk-free overnight investment for money funds. The facility had grown from just $10 billion at year-end 2020 to $2.554 trillion in two years, an unprecedented run-up. The peak remains the all-time high for the series and frames the magnitude of the liquidity buffer that absorbed quantitative tightening through 2023-2026 without producing the predicted equity weakness.
How much has RRP drained from peak?+
RRPONTSYD drained from $2.554 trillion on December 30, 2022 to approximately $0.7 billion on April 29, 2026, a 99.97 percent decline over 28 months. The most rapid declines occurred in mid-2023 (the post-debt-ceiling Treasury bill issuance surge pulled cash from RRP into bills) and in late 2024 after the Fed cut the ON RRP rate by an additional 5 basis points on top of the policy rate cut on December 18, 2024, sending RRP from $230 billion to $98 billion within a week. The drain has been the longest and largest sustained liquidity withdrawal of the post-2008 era.
Did the RRP drain hurt the S&P 500?+
No. SPY rose from $381.34 on December 30, 2022 (the RRP peak day) to $568.40 on April 29, 2026, a 49.1 percent total-return advance over the same 28-month window in which $2.55 trillion drained from RRP. The simplest version of the QT-as-equity-headwind thesis is falsified at the multi-year horizon. The mechanism is that RRP drained primarily into Treasury bills rather than into risk assets: bill share of Treasury issuance rose from 16 percent to 22 percent over 2023-2024, money-fund AUM grew from $4.7 trillion to $6.8 trillion, and bank reserves remained well above the $2.5 trillion ample-reserves threshold.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.