CONVEX
Correlation Deep Dive

Homebuilders (XHB) vs Russell 2000 (IWM): Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation of daily returns for Homebuilders (XHB) and Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Rolling windows, yearly breakdown, regression beta, and divergence analysis. Data window spans to (1,273 aligned observations).

30-Day
+0.724
Strong positive
90-Day
+0.801
Very strong positive
1-Year
+0.669
Strong positive
5-Year
+0.787
Strong positive

What the Number Means

With a correlation of 0.80, Homebuilders (XHB) and Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) move together with remarkable consistency. A daily move in one is a reliable predictor of the direction of the other. This tight coupling usually reflects a common driver or a direct mechanical relationship.

Recent vs Long-Run Behavior

Last 90 Days
+0.801
5-Year Baseline
+0.787

Recent correlation tracks the long-run relationship closely. No meaningful divergence. The historical pattern between Homebuilders (XHB) and Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is intact and should continue to serve as a reasonable baseline for positioning.

Statistical Details (1-Year Window)

Pearson Correlation (r)+0.669
R-Squared (r²)0.448
Beta (Homebuilders (XHB) vs Russell 2000 ETF (IWM))0.935
Daily Volatility σ(Homebuilders (XHB))1.69%
Daily Volatility σ(Russell 2000 ETF (IWM))1.21%
Observations252

Correlation measures directional co-movement; R² quantifies the fraction of variance explained by the linear relationship. Beta is the slope coefficient from regressing Homebuilders (XHB) returns on Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) returns. A beta above 1 means the first asset amplifies moves of the second.

Year-by-Year Correlation

YearCorrelationStrengthObservations
2026+0.684Strong positive130
2025+0.741Strong positive250
2024+0.767Strong positive252
2023+0.829Very strong positive250
2022+0.867Very strong positive251
2021+0.691Strong positive140

Year-by-year correlation reveals how the relationship has held up across different macro regimes. Sharp year-over-year swings in correlation often mark the transition between stress and calm periods.

Rolling 90-Day Extremes

Most Correlated Period
+0.910
ending 2022-12-12
Most Decoupled Period
+0.522
ending 2026-03-02

Extremes in rolling 90-day correlation often coincide with regime changes, forced deleveraging, or the arrival of a dominant new macro theme that overwhelms normal relationships.

Methodology

Correlations are computed on daily log-adjacent returns for Homebuilders (XHB) and Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), aligned on shared trading dates. We use the Pearson product-moment coefficient, which measures the linear relationship between two return series.

Windows are the most recent N observations for 30D, 90D, and 1Y (252 trading days); the 5Y figure uses all aligned data up to 1,260 observations. Beta is the OLS slope from regressing the first series on the second. Data updates daily with a 24-hour revalidation cadence.

Related Correlations

More Comparisons

Get daily macro analysis on shifting correlations, regime transitions, and cross-asset signals.

Correlation is not causation and backward-looking statistics can fail when regimes shift. Positions sized on historical correlation assumptions should be stress-tested against scenarios where the relationship breaks. For informational purposes only.