CONVEX
Historical Event · 2013Reflation Regime

2013 Taper Tantrum

May–September 2013· Analysis last reviewed

When Fed Chair Ben Bernanke suggested tapering QE in May 2013, 10Y Treasury yields nearly doubled, emerging markets cracked, and carry trades unwound violently.

What Happened

On May 22, 2013, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke testified to Congress that the FOMC could begin tapering asset purchases "in the next few meetings" if economic data continued to improve. The market reaction was immediate and violent. 10Y Treasury yields spiked from 1.62% to over 3.00% by year-end, one of the most rapid bond selloffs in history. Emerging markets took the brunt. The "Fragile Five", Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey, South Africa, saw their currencies drop 15-25%. EM equities fell. Local-currency debt spreads widened. The trade wasn't about US economic strength; it was about the removal of dollar liquidity that had flooded EM fixed income as global investors reached for yield during QE. The Taper Tantrum established the playbook for every subsequent Fed communication pivot. Markets learned to front-run Fed moves rather than wait for announcements. The Fed learned that even hints of tightening could cause cross-asset disruption far greater than the actual policy change. Subsequent tapering, which actually began in December 2013 and wound down smoothly, passed with almost no market impact because the shock was priced in advance.

Timeline

  1. 2013-05-22
    Bernanke mentions tapering in testimony
  2. 2013-06-19
    FOMC outlines specific taper timeline
  3. 2013-09-05
    10Y yield peaks at 3.01%
  4. 2013-09-18
    Fed surprises market by not tapering
  5. 2013-12-18
    Taper officially begins, $10B/month reduction

Asset Performance

10Y yield nearly doubled from 1.62% to 3.00% in four months.

Gold fell sharply on higher real yields.

Dollar strengthened modestly as rate differentials moved favorably.

S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
+14% over the year

US equities absorbed the shock and continued higher.

Lessons Learned

  • Fed communication moves markets more than Fed actions.
  • QE flowed into EM reach-for-yield trades that unwound violently.
  • Rate shocks price in advance, actual events are anticlimactic.
  • Duration positioning is more important than yield level predictions.

How Today Compares

  • Any Fed communication about balance sheet adjustments
  • EM local-currency bond spreads
  • Carry trade funding currency moves
  • Real rates vs. nominal rates divergence

Affected Countries

Related Scenarios

Related Events

Get real-time analysis of unfolding events, before consensus forms.