CONVEX
Correlation Deep Dive

EM Dollar Index vs Emerging Markets (EEM): Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation of daily returns for EM Dollar Index and Emerging Markets (EEM). Rolling windows, yearly breakdown, regression beta, and divergence analysis. Data window spans to (1,237 aligned observations).

30-Day
-0.418
Moderate negative
90-Day
-0.542
Moderate negative
1-Year
-0.541
Moderate negative
5-Year
-0.526
Moderate negative

What the Number Means

The -0.54 correlation indicates that EM Dollar Index and Emerging Markets (EEM) have a moderate tendency to move in opposite directions. The relationship is real but noisy, with frequent days where they disagree. Regime context matters: the correlation often strengthens during stress and weakens during calm periods.

Recent vs Long-Run Behavior

Last 90 Days
-0.542
5-Year Baseline
-0.526

Recent correlation tracks the long-run relationship closely. No meaningful divergence. The historical pattern between EM Dollar Index and Emerging Markets (EEM) is intact and should continue to serve as a reasonable baseline for positioning.

Statistical Details (1-Year Window)

Pearson Correlation (r)-0.541
R-Squared (r²)0.292
Beta (EM Dollar Index vs Emerging Markets (EEM))-0.114
Daily Volatility σ(EM Dollar Index)0.24%
Daily Volatility σ(Emerging Markets (EEM))1.16%
Observations252

Correlation measures directional co-movement; R² quantifies the fraction of variance explained by the linear relationship. Beta is the slope coefficient from regressing EM Dollar Index returns on Emerging Markets (EEM) returns. A beta above 1 means the first asset amplifies moves of the second.

Year-by-Year Correlation

YearCorrelationStrengthObservations
2026-0.546Moderate negative77
2025-0.467Moderate negative248
2024-0.580Moderate negative250
2023-0.545Moderate negative248
2022-0.542Moderate negative249
2021-0.520Moderate negative165

Year-by-year correlation reveals how the relationship has held up across different macro regimes. Sharp year-over-year swings in correlation often mark the transition between stress and calm periods.

Rolling 90-Day Extremes

Most Correlated Period
-0.180
ending 2025-08-18
Most Decoupled Period
-0.711
ending 2024-05-03

Extremes in rolling 90-day correlation often coincide with regime changes, forced deleveraging, or the arrival of a dominant new macro theme that overwhelms normal relationships.

Methodology

Correlations are computed on daily log-adjacent returns for EM Dollar Index and Emerging Markets (EEM), aligned on shared trading dates. We use the Pearson product-moment coefficient, which measures the linear relationship between two return series.

Windows are the most recent N observations for 30D, 90D, and 1Y (252 trading days); the 5Y figure uses all aligned data up to 1,260 observations. Beta is the OLS slope from regressing the first series on the second. Data updates daily with a 24-hour revalidation cadence.

Related Correlations

More Comparisons

Get daily macro analysis on shifting correlations, regime transitions, and cross-asset signals.

Correlation is not causation and backward-looking statistics can fail when regimes shift. Positions sized on historical correlation assumptions should be stress-tested against scenarios where the relationship breaks. For informational purposes only.