CONVEX
Correlation Deep Dive

CFTC Gold Positioning vs Gold Price: Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation of daily returns for Gold Net Speculative Positioning and Gold (Spot). Rolling windows, yearly breakdown, regression beta, and divergence analysis. Data window spans to (260 aligned observations).

30-Day
-0.185
Essentially uncorrelated
90-Day
+0.181
Essentially uncorrelated
1-Year
+0.485
Moderate positive
5-Year
+0.495
Moderate positive

What the Number Means

With a correlation of 0.18, Gold Net Speculative Positioning and Gold (Spot) are essentially uncorrelated at daily frequency. Either the relationship operates at a different time horizon or the shared driver has been dominated by idiosyncratic noise during the observation window.

Recent vs Long-Run Behavior

Last 90 Days
+0.181
5-Year Baseline
+0.495

The correlation has weakened materially. The 90-day reading of 0.18 sits 0.31 below the long-run average of 0.49. Falling correlation signals the dispersion regime where idiosyncratic stories dominate and cross-asset diversification benefits improve.

Statistical Details (1-Year Window)

Pearson Correlation (r)+0.485
R-Squared (r²)0.236
Beta (Gold Net Speculative Positioning vs Gold (Spot))2.408
Daily Volatility σ(Gold Net Speculative Positioning)11.82%
Daily Volatility σ(Gold (Spot))2.38%
Observations252

Correlation measures directional co-movement; R² quantifies the fraction of variance explained by the linear relationship. Beta is the slope coefficient from regressing Gold Net Speculative Positioning returns on Gold (Spot) returns. A beta above 1 means the first asset amplifies moves of the second.

Year-by-Year Correlation

YearCorrelationStrengthObservations
2026-0.189Essentially uncorrelated17
2025+0.260Weak positive52
2024+0.625Strong positive53
2023+0.760Strong positive52
2022+0.766Strong positive52
2021+0.915Very strong positive34

Year-by-year correlation reveals how the relationship has held up across different macro regimes. Sharp year-over-year swings in correlation often mark the transition between stress and calm periods.

Rolling 90-Day Extremes

Most Correlated Period
+0.820
ending 2024-03-26
Most Decoupled Period
+0.179
ending 2026-04-21

Extremes in rolling 90-day correlation often coincide with regime changes, forced deleveraging, or the arrival of a dominant new macro theme that overwhelms normal relationships.

Methodology

Correlations are computed on daily log-adjacent returns for Gold Net Speculative Positioning and Gold (Spot), aligned on shared trading dates. We use the Pearson product-moment coefficient, which measures the linear relationship between two return series.

Windows are the most recent N observations for 30D, 90D, and 1Y (252 trading days); the 5Y figure uses all aligned data up to 1,260 observations. Beta is the OLS slope from regressing the first series on the second. Data updates daily with a 24-hour revalidation cadence.

Related Correlations

More Comparisons

Get daily macro analysis on shifting correlations, regime transitions, and cross-asset signals.

Correlation is not causation and backward-looking statistics can fail when regimes shift. Positions sized on historical correlation assumptions should be stress-tested against scenarios where the relationship breaks. For informational purposes only.