What Happened
The IMF has issued a formal warning of an inflation crisis tied to US-Israel military strikes on Iran, citing oil supply disruption as the primary transmission mechanism. This is not a tail risk being flagged, it is the Fund explicitly pricing a stagflationary shock into its baseline outlook.
What Our Data Says
This event lands directly on our highest-conviction asymmetric trade: LONG WTI / SHORT BONDS. WTI crude was last quoted at $102.28 (stale, 2.7h old, treat as indicative) and Brent at $97.38 on the same vintage. These figures should be treated as indicative only, but they establish the pre-event baseline. The more important data point is structural: CFTC net positioning in WTI sits at the 2nd percentile of historical shorts, the most unloved, crowded-short commodity position in the dataset. An IMF-validated supply shock is precisely the mechanical squeeze trigger this positioning setup requires.
On the inflation side, the CONVEX inflation regime indicator sits at 15/100, deeply suppressed, while gold has been printing all-time highs at $4,789/oz (stale, 2.7h). That divergence, gold at ATH while breakevens fall and the inflation regime score stays muted, is itself the market's core incoherence. The IMF warning begins resolving that contradiction in the inflationary direction. The 10Y real yield at 1.96% (FRED, April 9) is incompatible with a genuine oil shock; a supply-driven CPI surge would compress real yields aggressively as nominals lag the commodity impulse, amplifying the bond short.
VIX presents a data quality problem: the PriceSnapshot shows 34.54 while the FRED resolver shows 21.04, a significant divergence with a 169-hour staleness gap on the snapshot. I will not construct a narrative from this discrepancy, but the FRED figure of 21.04 (April 9) is the more credible current reference. At 21, VIX is materially underpricing a geopolitical oil shock of this magnitude. Historical analogue: the 2019 Saudi Aramco drone strikes sent VIX from ~14 to ~19 intraday on a supply disruption a fraction of the scale being implied here.
The DXY (85.9h stale at 99.98) is unreliable for real-time inference, but the structural dollar bearish thesis is actually reinforced by an oil shock: a stagflationary impulse that the Fed cannot offset without crushing growth removes the rate-differential tailwind that would otherwise support the dollar. Bitcoin at $72,341 (live, 1:53 PM ET) is holding the upper end of our $62,000–$78,000 range, not yet pricing the risk-off contagion an oil shock would eventually deliver.
What This Means
The IMF warning upgrades our scenario probability distribution. "Inflation Re-acceleration/Energy Shock" moves from 10% to 20-25% as a base case scenario, at the direct expense of "Soft Disinflation" (25% → 15%). Stagflation Deepening likely absorbs the remainder, rising toward 35-40%. The macro regime thesis, late-stage stagflation with internal incoherence, is no longer ambiguous on one axis: the energy vector is now pointing unambiguously inflationary. The April 10 CPI print, already the most important single data event in the next 30 days, now has an additional geopolitical accelerant behind any upside surprise.
Positioning Implications
The LONG WTI / SHORT BONDS pair is the cleanest expression of this shock, oil's 2nd-percentile short positioning creates mechanical squeeze fuel, while the 10Y at 4.33% has no business staying there if WTI sustains above $100 with an IMF-endorsed supply narrative. Watch the Strait of Hormuz shipping insurance premium and the [5Y5Y forward breakeven](/glossary/breakeven-inflation), if the latter breaks above 2.5% in the next 48 hours, the bond short leg of this trade becomes urgent rather than merely tactical.
Explore these indicators together: Chart WTI Crude Oil, WTI Crude Oil, and 3 more on the Indicators Dashboard