What Happened
A Trump-brokered 'double-sided ceasefire' has reopened the Strait of Hormuz, producing a broad Asian equity rally and what markets are treating as a systemic geopolitical regime break. The immediate mechanical reaction is textbook: oil supply shock reversal, risk-on rotation, and a compression of the geopolitical risk premium that had been embedded across asset classes.
What Our Data Says
The honest answer is that our oil data is too stale to anchor precise repricing. WTI was sitting at $95.55 (April 7, 8.4 hours old) against a FRED March 30 reading of $104.69, already a ~$9 correction before this event. Brent at $97.17 is 54.5 hours old and effectively useless for intraday analysis. What we can say is that pre-event oil was already correcting off its highs, meaning some geopolitical risk premium had already been partially unwound. The Hormuz reopening likely lands into a market where the risk-premium compression trade has a shorter runway than the headline suggests.
The VIX picture is murky: the FRED daily close reads 24.17 (April 8) against a PriceSnapshot of 34.54, a significant divergence we cannot resolve cleanly. We will not construct a vol narrative from that gap. What we can observe is that at 24.17, volatility was already elevated relative to pre-tariff norms, consistent with a market pricing ongoing regime uncertainty rather than a clean risk-on pulse.
Bitcoin at $71,648 (live, 3:34 AM ET) is the only clean real-time signal available during closed US equity markets. Its relative stability, essentially flat from prior readings, suggests the de-escalation enthusiasm in Asian equities has not yet transmitted into a speculative crypto surge. That is either a signal of contained risk appetite or simply thin pre-market conditions. Do not over-read it.
Gold at $4,845 (stale, 8.4h) is the key instrument to watch on the open. A Hormuz de-escalation is textbook gold-negative on the geopolitical pillar. However, our four-pillar gold bull thesis, CFTC at 17th percentile, real yield decoupling, term premium acceleration to 67bp, and CB structural diversification, rests almost entirely on fiscal credibility erosion and dollar debasement dynamics, not on Middle East risk premium. A geopolitical unwind alone is unlikely to invalidate a $5,000–5,200 target.
What This Means
The stagflation thesis is stress-tested, not broken. The Hormuz reopening addresses exactly one of its three drivers: energy supply-side cost-push. It does nothing to the 25% tariff stack that is driving NVI to 871% above baseline, nothing to consumer sentiment at 56.6, and nothing to the quit rate at 1.9% signaling labor market softening. If oil drops $15–20 on this, it buys perhaps 20–30bp of CPI relief, meaningful for the April 10 print optics, but not a structural regime shift. The 1974–75 analogy holds: even after the Arab oil embargo ended, the underlying inflation and growth compression persisted for months.
The more significant risk is that a risk-on surge into April 10 CPI creates exactly the wrong positioning: if the print comes in hot (≥2.9%, 20% probability), a market that just rotated risk-on into a geopolitical relief trade faces a double-barreled reversal.
Positioning Implications
Watch whether the WTI open confirms a clean break below $90, that is the level at which oil's CPI contribution materially shifts the May print trajectory and begins to genuinely challenge the stagflation duration thesis. Until that confirmation arrives with fresh data, treat the Hormuz rally as a risk-premium compression event within an intact stagflation regime, not a macro turning point.
Explore these indicators together: Chart WTI Crude Oil, WTI Crude Oil, and 3 more on the Indicators Dashboard